← All projectsSELECTED WORK / 01

Explorer

UAV SYSTEMS · MAJOR PROJECT
Flight-capable proof of concept

Fly there. Perch. Keep sensing.

Explorer asks how a forest-monitoring drone could remain useful after its motors stop. I developed a flight-capable prototype that combines active perching, depth sensing, embedded control and experimental solar charging.

Explore the process
Physical proof of concept · active retention with integrated solar hardware
Physical proof of concept · active retention with integrated solar hardware
MY CONTRIBUTION

Individual MSc major project · research, design, fabrication, electronics, software and testing

METHODS + TOOLS

SolidWorks · FDM printing · ESP32-S3 · Dynamixel · ToF sensing

View portfolio PDF ↗
8 × 8Depth-sensing array
5Integrated system functions
1Flight-capable proof of concept
01The opportunity

Change the mission, then the machine.

A monitoring aircraft consumes energy simply staying in the air. Explorer investigates a different operating cycle: travel to a useful location, attach to a branch, stop propulsion and continue collecting environmental information.

The wider vision is a distributed monitoring network. The major project focused on its first practical unit: one aircraft that could fly, retain its own mass on a perch, sense its surroundings and record data.

Future product concept from the major-project folio. The physical proof of concept is shown below.
01

Arrive

Use flight to reach a monitoring position.

02

Remain

Transfer support from the rotors to a physical perch.

03

Observe

Continue sensing and explore solar-assisted energy recovery.

02Mechanism development

The best iteration removed complexity.

My first mechanism used a wide lateral arrangement with several moving relationships. Printing and assembly revealed its cost in width, mass, alignment and interference. A smaller direct-gear design reduced the footprint, but could back-drive under load.

I moved to a worm-driven architecture and iterated tooth geometry, shaft support, hook clearance and mounting. The intention was to retain a perch without depending on continuous servo holding torque. Physical parts made the problems visible far earlier than a finished render could.

Early lateral mechanism: a movement study that exposed packaging and complexity problems.
Worm-drive development: testing the transmission before committing to the full aircraft.
03Product architecture

A collection of parts became one system.

The carbon frame carries flight loads; custom printed parts locate the actuator, power hardware, electronics and battery around it. The packaging had to respect the centre of gravity, propeller sweep, cable routes and access for assembly.

Repeated fits exposed details that looked acceptable in CAD: blocked screws, weak snap features, battery straps, connector clearance and wiring space. I developed the prototype around parts that could actually be assembled and serviced, then consolidated the bench wiring into the aircraft.

Integrated prototype packaging around the carbon flight frame.
Electronics and wiring development before final consolidation.
01

Load path

Separate the structural frame from component-specific housings.

02

Access

Leave space to connect, fasten, remove and adjust real parts.

03

Balance

Evaluate component placement in flight and on the perch.

04Embedded development

Prove each subsystem. Then connect them.

Reliable Dynamixel communication and repeatable position control came first. That feedback loop let me change hook geometry and recalibrate movement without redesigning the electronics each time.

The ESP32-S3 acquired frames from the VL53L8CX 8 × 8 Time-of-Flight sensor. Live visualisation helped interpret depth data during development; onboard logging allowed sessions to be replayed after testing. The experimental solar architecture was integrated as a separate energy-recovery investigation.

Depth-data visualisation and replay developed for the proof of concept.
05Field validation

The field test wrote the next brief.

Flight testing confirmed stable, controllable operation with the integrated hardware. Controlled low-height retention tests demonstrated hook actuation, support of the vehicle’s mass and release. Manual in-flight alignment with a branch was not successfully completed.

A subsequent piloting error caused a low-height impact and damaged the hooks and solar-panel housing. That failure made impact protection and field robustness explicit requirements for the next iteration.

The integrated prototype during outdoor testing.
Field-test documentation from the final major-project folio.
01

Demonstrated

Controllable flight, RC actuation, retention, release and depth logging.

02

Learned

Hook and solar mounts need to survive handling and impact.

03

Next

Closed-loop approach, repeatable capture and environmental endurance.

06From prototype to product

The architecture continues. The packaging evolves.

The final product vision translates the functional prototype into a more integrated aircraft. It considers fewer assemblies, protected electronics, lighter energy hardware and replaceable service modules.

Accessible hobby electronics and commercial panels accelerated experimentation. A field-ready platform would need a stronger energy-to-mass ratio, environmental protection and much longer reliability testing.

Proposed product architecture and exploded assembly from the final folio.
EXPLORER / PROJECT FILMS

See the work
in motion.

Om Shah Design on YouTube ↗
02 / PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

Final test flight + crash

Field testing and the impact that informed the next iteration.

YouTube ↗
03 / PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

First flight

The prototype takes to the air.

YouTube ↗
04 / PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

Live LiDAR visualisation

Watching depth data as it arrives from the sensor.

YouTube ↗
05 / PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

LiDAR Studio

The visualisation environment developed for the sensing workflow.

YouTube ↗
06 / PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

Dynamixel servo connection

Establishing communication with the actuator.

YouTube ↗
07 / MECHANISM STUDY

First successful servo actuation

Turning a control signal into physical movement.

YouTube ↗
08 / MECHANISM STUDY

Worm gear

A closer look at the transmission in motion.

YouTube ↗
09 / MECHANISM STUDY

Design 1, V4 mechanism

An earlier mechanism iteration, captured during development.

YouTube ↗
OUTCOME + REFLECTION

System feasibility, made tangible.

The strongest result is the integration of mechanics, electronics and testing in a functioning platform, and a precise understanding of what remains to be solved.

What the project delivered

  • Flight-capable integrated aircraft
  • RC-controlled retention and release
  • Live depth sensing and onboard data logging
  • Experimental solar-charging integration

Where I would take it next

  • Autonomous approach and branch selection
  • A complete flown approach-to-capture sequence
  • Weather protection and repeated perch-cycle testing
  • Optimised energy hardware and network coordination
FROM THE PROJECT ARCHIVE

Major-project discovery folio; final 195-page CW2 folio, particularly mechanism development and pages 169–193; updated portfolio, pages 3–9.

Open the full portfolio ↗
KEEP EXPLORING / 02The Cube

Small scale. Precise decisions.